Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35

Thread: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

  1. #1

    Default Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Yes, yes, I know that the good guys will eventually win the war and defeat the Decepticons but c'mon, they're not supposed to suck this bad in combat...

    I mean, the only 2 kills the Decepticons ever got over the Autobots all came from Megatron (Jazz and Optimus Prime with the latter reviving in the same movie it dies...). Of course, he's the most powerful Decepticon and everything but it's like his comrades can't do anything right. Starscream is the second best Decepticon and all he ever did was remove a pair of legs from Bumblebee and put up a fight against Ratchet and Ironhide (which was evened by the spanking he received in ROTF).

    I mean, when the only Autobot that supposedly stays dead in the whole movie is an ex-Decepticon... that's like a huge slap to the Decepticon insignia.

    Here's one hoping that in the next movie(s) the Cons will at least put up a better fight than this

  2. #2
    Senior Member Trailbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    10,422

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Being bad guys, most Decepticons are reckless, aggressive, single-minded bastards. Bonecrusher is horribly aggressive, he hates everything and will kill it, that's all he does. Blackout is single minded, it's all about Megatron and loyalty. They both died. Megatron was obsessed with getting the cube, he got the cube alright, but it killed him. See them chasing Sam all over the place in ROTF? That's all they care about, and they got their asses kicked by Prime because of it. Soundwave seems to be the smart one, and stayed up there in space.

    Autobots' heads usually aren't up their tailpipes with ultimate power and all of that stuff bad guys want so therefore they end up putting up a better fight because they're more focused on winning the fight, on what they were trained to do.
    "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they're genuine." - Abraham Lincoln

  3. #3
    Senior Member XxSoundwavexX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NEW YORK
    Posts
    571

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream- View Post
    Yes, yes, I know that the good guys will eventually win the war and defeat the Decepticons but c'mon, they're not supposed to suck this bad in combat...

    I mean, the only 2 kills the Decepticons ever got over the Autobots all came from Megatron (Jazz and Optimus Prime with the latter reviving in the same movie it dies...). Of course, he's the most powerful Decepticon and everything but it's like his comrades can't do anything right. Starscream is the second best Decepticon and all he ever did was remove a pair of legs from Bumblebee and put up a fight against Ratchet and Ironhide (which was evened by the spanking he received in ROTF).

    I mean, when the only Autobot that supposedly stays dead in the whole movie is an ex-Decepticon... that's like a huge slap to the Decepticon insignia.

    Here's one hoping that in the next movie(s) the Cons will at least put up a better fight than this
    yep yep i know how u feel...

  4. #4

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Agreed, most of them are just pretty stupid and reckless, I'm just surprised that in 2 movies all the Cons could muster was 2 kills and a half (if you count Bee's legs and Scorponok's blow on Jetfire). Meanwhile, the Cons' casualties must be up in the 30s or something with all the spanking they took in the final battle.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Trailbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    10,422

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Keep in mind also that there are way more Decepticons than Autobots in both movies, so I guess that kinda balances out the fairness a bit.
    "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they're genuine." - Abraham Lincoln

  6. #6

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    In their "defense" it took quite a bit to take out... the Tank guy in TF1, so maybe some are just quite a bit weaker? Better armaments but less regen power or ability to withstand hits?
    "to punish and enslave"

  7. #7
    Senior Member XxSoundwavexX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NEW YORK
    Posts
    571

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    ihope they give them a harder time in the 3rd and last film..

  8. #8
    Senior Member megatron42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    some where on earth
    Posts
    6,805

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    as leader it is a slap in the face
    we decepticons now face our darkest hour:megatron from transformers prime

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    209

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream- View Post
    Agreed, most of them are just pretty stupid and reckless .
    Stupid?? hardly. But I do agree on recklessness.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Stupid more in the sense that they have 0 cohesion, teamwork and plan of attack. How they managed to screw up in that desert fight so badly when their primary threat was out for the count and they outnumbered the Bots some 3 to 1 is beyond me

  11. #11

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    personality to me i thought megatron was badass in this one, he went off his head.

    same with the fallen.

    but if decepticons were to win, how bad would the movie feel for viewers who arent fimilar with the transformers universe?

  12. #12

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Revolution. View Post
    personality to me i thought megatron was badass in this one, he went off his head.

    same with the fallen.

    but if decepticons were to win, how bad would the movie feel for viewers who arent fimilar with the transformers universe?
    i know but the decepticons have got like 3 (arcee,jazz,optimus) kills to the autobots 30. The deceoticons could at least get jolt i mean jolt was useless.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Did Arcee die or just disappear?? Idk, from what I can recall I just saw her take some heavy fire in that desert fight although maybe 1 of the bikes got destroyed but the other 2 survived.

    I thought they just disappeared like Barricade did in the first movie :wtf

  14. #14
    Senior Member Jammed9000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    A large hole called "Australia".
    Posts
    379

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Look, there's just so many plot holes that you've gotta wonder exactly where it all goes wrong. Is it the writing? Is it the directing? Is it the editing?
    "Science fiction isn't about spaceships, laser-fights, and explosions, Sci-Fi is about placing humanity in extreme positions and examining their reactions and our morality, as well as postulating on our future development as a species and as individuals."

  15. #15
    Member ChozoGhost87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    99

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jammed9000 View Post
    Look, there's just so many plot holes that you've gotta wonder exactly where it all goes wrong. Is it the writing? Is it the directing? Is it the editing?
    ? Whether or not Arcee and/or one or two of her "sisters" died or not isn't really a plot hole... If the trilogy is complete and we still don't have an answer (Barricade?), then I'd say it's a plot hole.


  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream- View Post
    How they managed to screw up in that desert fight so badly when their primary threat was out for the count and they outnumbered the Bots some 3 to 1 is beyond me
    It was nowhere near as lopsided as its made out to be. Yes there were more robots sided with the cons, but teh autobots had a lot of backup in the form of human military forces. the foot soldiers may not have been really effective, but the 3 tanks sittign on the ridge took out 3 or 4 cons by themselves. AND dont forget giant bomb toward the end of the battle AND especially dont forget the USS Kidd and its giant Devastator destroying railgun.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Xsubs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    783

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by esdren View Post
    It was nowhere near as lopsided as its made out to be. Yes there were more robots sided with the cons, but teh autobots had a lot of backup in the form of human military forces. the foot soldiers may not have been really effective, but the 3 tanks sittign on the ridge took out 3 or 4 cons by themselves. AND dont forget giant bomb toward the end of the battle AND especially dont forget the USS Kidd and its giant Devastator destroying railgun.
    They had the railgun the whole time through this movie and they only used it once?? PLot hole.....

  18. #18

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by esdren View Post
    It was nowhere near as lopsided as its made out to be. Yes there were more robots sided with the cons, but teh autobots had a lot of backup in the form of human military forces. the foot soldiers may not have been really effective, but the 3 tanks sittign on the ridge took out 3 or 4 cons by themselves. AND dont forget giant bomb toward the end of the battle AND especially dont forget the USS Kidd and its giant Devastator destroying railgun.
    This is specially what troubles me. Transformers supposedly have a huge, huge technological superiority compared to even the US army. Heck, they can build Sun harvesters, not to mention that they can travel through space when we are only scratching the surface of intergalactical exploration... 1 of them can teleport himself across a vast distance in a blink of an eye. Another can lift boulders without effort and change the course of supersonic projectiles as if they were in slow-mo.

    Yet, when they're faced with the human threat, they seem to falter and fall flat in their asses... at least in the most important battles. It is also beyond me why SS didn't help at all in that desert battle. He could have easily destroyed the tanks that were giving support there. Heck, it's beyond me why SS didn't get to fight anyone in that desert battle, considering in the 1st movie he took 2 Autobots by himself and a few raptors down.

  19. #19
    Senior Member chops's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    445

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    when you think about it they weren't that bad in battle. they had an army of nations going against them with jets, tanks, helicopters, and autobots. thats not an easy win.
    "I find your lack of faith disturbing."

    Darth Vader

  20. #20
    Drake
    Guest

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    The decepticons lost the element of surprise. The military already knew their weaknesses (thermal rounds) and also had time to understand their tactics. It would be pretty cool if in the 3rd movie, the decepticons figure this out, upgrade, and the first human rounds fired at them are completely ineffective.

    As for SS... if you hadn't noticed, when he knows the fight will be lost, he bails, or in this case, hides. He's actually smart in this regard, being able to anticipate the loss ahead of time.

  21. #21

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    The thing is, he hit retreat too early in ROTF. He could of at least helped like in the first movie... fighting a bit but always making sure survival was first priority. In ROTF he was just shown flying above in the desert sky giving a few orders but doing nothing else to try and help from the get-go.

  22. #22
    Senior Member megatron42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    some where on earth
    Posts
    6,805

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    he's a chicken.. why can't he be like thundercracker,or like the other seekers
    we decepticons now face our darkest hour:megatron from transformers prime

  23. #23
    Senior Member Trailbreaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    10,422

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    Quote Originally Posted by megatron42 View Post
    he's a chicken.. why can't he be like thundercracker,or like the other seekers
    He also looks like one, too.
    "The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they're genuine." - Abraham Lincoln

  24. #24
    Senior Member megatron42's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    some where on earth
    Posts
    6,805

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    he backs down when i give him orders.. any ideas?
    we decepticons now face our darkest hour:megatron from transformers prime

  25. #25
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: Decepticons unusually bad cannon fodder? (SPOILERS)

    pin him down under your foot and run your treads over him some more, that should get his butt into gear

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •