-
Member
-
Senior Member
Re: Would anyone else have wanted Bruticus in TF2?
I want to see Bruticus more than Devastator and Menasor. But either will be fine.
I guess they could still use another helicopter and a tank but I think it might confuse the general audience who might think "didn't they already kill the tank and the helicopter?"
I would love to see an autobot co-operated effort attack against one combiner
-
Junior Member
Re: Would anyone else have wanted Bruticus in TF2?
Considering the tank in T1 was *supposed* to be brawl.. it would make sense. But he's dead. Devastator would be sweet too... but Bonecrusher got axed...
Perhaps another set of 5 that Bay and Co. make up from both?
-
Senior Member
Re: Would anyone else have wanted Bruticus in TF2?
It is more likely that they will do Devastator than Bruticus, because the Constructicons and Devastator are the most well-known combiners (and, in my opinion, coolest). Because they already killed a helicopter and tank transformers in the first one, I think it might confuse people who aren't familiar with Transformers. Plus, I would like to see some variety, not just military vehicles, among the Decepticons.
-
Senior Member
Re: Would anyone else have wanted Bruticus in TF2?
I wouldn't even mind if there was a combiner named "Bruticus" and it consisted of 5 Decepticons that were not the original Bruticus parts. After all, the TF movie has already gone through so many changes and it isn't G1 to begin with. It never was so I say, go ahead and make a combiner with parts from the best combiners but at least let the parts be consistent with each other and have a certain theme. THey don't have to be named the original parts.
Hell they can even called the Constructicon to be Bruticus and mix and match the names.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks